Dark Skies Passes 4-1

Posted on 11 December 2009

An effort to keep the skies over Southampton Town darker and the stars more visible has been approved. After closing the public hearing on November 24, the Southampton Town Board passed the outdoor lighting, or “Dark Skies,” legislation this Tuesday. Town supervisor Linda Kabot, along with councilwomen Anna Throne-Holst, Nancy Graboski and Sally Pope, supported the resolution, but councilman Chris Nuzzi voted against it. The law, explained its sponsor, Graboski, is aimed at handling instances of nuisance lighting and enacting the use of shielded lights, and energy efficient bulbs, for new constructions.

“Good outdoor lighting at night in the Town of Southampton benefits everyone as it increases safety due to reduced glare, promotes good health of our environment and citizenry, and preserves the ability to view the stars against a dark night sky,” said the introduction of the law.

When the first public hearing on the lighting law was held in June, the measure received criticism from local business organizations. At a meeting in early June, Richard Warren with the Southampton Business Alliance said the law would incur significant costs for homeowners and commercial businesses. One of the earliest versions of the “Dark Skies” legislation stipulated that all pre-existing lighting had to be brought into compliance within 10 years of the legislation’s effective date. Some supporters of the law, including a representative from the Group for the East End, suggested town residents be given only five years to become compliant. The law was vetted in public hearings for several months.

“We took all of those concerns raised and evaluated them. I was grateful that everyone was taking the time to take a hard look at this. It is a comprehensive law and the fact that it took a period of time really isn’t unusual,” explained Graboski. “We did an overhaul of the sign ordinance in 2005. It took several hearings to refine it and to get it to an acceptable place.”

In the current version of the law, all pre-existing lighting is exempt from the provisions of the “Dark Skies” legislation unless the property owner is replacing, changing, repairing or relocating a light fixture. Holiday lighting and lights that illuminate a flag pole are also exempt. Graboski explained that if a resident simply changes a bulb of an outdoor light, they wouldn’t need to bring the lighting fixture into compliance. However, if the same resident wished to move the light fixture to a different place on the property, then the light would have to be brought up to code. New constructions or additions, for both commercial businesses and homeowners, will need to comply with the “Outdoor Lighting” law.

The new law includes a nuisance clause, which Graboski hopes will satisfy individual cases of light violation. A town resident can file a complaint with the town building department regarding a nuisance light at a neighboring property. The complaint has to be lodged by a neighbor of the offending property. Once the town investigates the case and finds that the property owner is violating the standards of “dark skies” friendly lighting then they will have 30 days to come into compliance. Residents who fail to change their lighting face fines ranging from $250 up to $500. Repeat offenders within a three-year period face misdemeanor charges and a fine of $1,000. Commercial businesses that are found to be violating the “Dark Skies” provisions, after a complaint has been filed, and fail to come into compliance within 30 days, must pay fines ranging from $500 to $1,000. If the business owner repeats the offense two or more times over three years, they also face a misdemeanor charge and pay a $3,000 fine.

Of the “Dark Skies legislation, Graboski said, “the law is giving us a better standard.”

Be Sociable, Share!

This post was written by:

- who has written 497 posts on The Sag Harbor Express.


Contact the author

5 Responses to “Dark Skies Passes 4-1”

  1. Art says:

    Our world is falling apart and our town leaders are spending their time and our money legislating light bulbs? How noble.

  2. Bill says:

    Pollution often sneaks up on us inconspicuously. Even though it seems so trivial, I’m glad the town is taking steps to preserve the night sky.

  3. Average Man says:

    Wasnt it our President that decreed that compact flourescent bulbs
    (you know, those twisted foreign made mercury laden bulbs) they were going to pull the country and the world away from destruction? So this is VERY important legislation, indeed.

  4. Jim says:

    Isn’t it about time that selfish lighting was looked at. Most of us never asked for a neighbor’s or local business’s flood lights to intrude into our space. Much the same as if I thought blasting music would keep deer away. Would you give me five years to bring my speakers into compliance if it was effecting your quality of life. For all of those worried about the cost of being a good neighbor and a responsible steward of our environment…there is a simple answer…. Just say ‘Off’ yes, shut them off and see how much you will save in energy while at the same time, being good to the world. Simple!

  5. Thanks for all of the efforts on this web page. Gloria loves managing internet research and it’s really obvious why. Most of us learn all of the powerful mode you deliver rewarding techniques by means of this web site and encourage participation from other individuals on that area of interest while our favorite girl is without question discovering a lot of things. Enjoy the rest of the new year. You’re conducting a powerful job Buscador de peliculas.


Leave a Reply

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off-topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Terms of Service