Categorized | Government, Page 1

North Haven Village to Bring in Sharpshooters for Deer Cull

Posted on 05 February 2014

By Stephen J. Kotz

Twenty years ago, the simple topic of whether North Haven should allow deer hunting of any kind within the village limits would have brought a capacity crowd of often angry people with conflicting opinions to Village Hall.

On Tuesday, when the village board announced it would hire the wildlife management firm, White Buffalo Inc., to help cull the local deer herd and allow its hunters to use shotguns, where until now it has only allowed bow hunting, not a voice was raised in objection.

That’s a far cry from East Hampton, where protestors mobilized to halt the town and village from moving forward with culling program championed by the Long Island Farm Bureau that would have relied on sharpshooters hired from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Service.

“We felt it was necessary to do something extraordinary,” said Mayor Jeff Sander in an interview before Tuesday’s meeting of the village’s efforts to rein in a deer population that has devastated gardens, crumpled car fenders, and led to an increase in tick-borne diseases.

The mayor stressed that the hunt, which he added could begin within a month, is only one part of a “multi-pronged” effort proposed by a village deer management committee to reduce the deer population and control disease. The village will continue to explore contraception alternatives as well weigh the benefits of installing 4-Poster units—feeding stations that force the deer to rub up against rollers that leave a coating of the insecticide permethrin on the animals’ coats, thus poisoning ticks in the process.

Mr. Sander said the immediate goal is to reduce the current North Haven deer herd, which he estimated at between 200 and 250 animals, to about 100. By contrast, when village leaders waged a contentious battle in the mid-1990s to allow bow hunting in the village, an estimated 450 to 500 deer were spilling out of the woods, denuding gardens and causing white knuckle driving on Ferry Road.

“Seasonal, recreational hunting has done fairly well,” the mayor said, “but it has fallen off.”

The mayor estimated that hiring White Buffalo would cost the village approximately $15,000. An exact figure as well as the final language of the contract is yet to be worked out, he said

The company’s hunters would be required to follow New York State Department of Conservation rules for shotgun hunting and would not be allowed to net the animals or have any other special privileges.

Tuesday’s meeting drew an audience of one. Sue Edwards told the board she supported the plan to bring in additional hunters, but she wanted to know what steps the village would take to notify residents that there might be shotgun-wielding hunters stalking white-tailed deer on the property next door.

Mayor Sander responded that the village would be sure to notify residents, as well as bow hunters, within a reasonable vicinity of where any shooting will be taking place.

Board members said they were concerned that deer would not be able to find enough food if the area continues to be visited by frequent snowfalls has it has been so far this winter.

Trustee Jamie Davis said that the deer are becoming ever more resourceful at gaining access to gardens that are now so often hidden behind fences and gates. He said he had heard of the animals using their noses to nudge open gates to gain access to the delectable treats within.

Edwards added that her neighbor had reported that deer, once discouraged by burlap-covered shrubs, have now learned to loosen the coverings so they can feed on the bottom of the plants.

Mayor Sander said the village is still exploring its options with 4-Posters as well as contraception and sterilization. Both solutions are expensive, with 4-Posters costing about $5,000 each and the village still awaiting word as to whether it will qualify for state funding to help offset the cost.

“You’ve got to stock them with feed and you need a licensed person to apply the permethrin because it can’t be handled by just anyone,” he said.

Dr. Anthony DeNicola, the president of White Buffalo, Inc. had recommended that the village complement hunting with a sterilization program, but Mr. Sander said that is also an expensive proposition and one that requires more study.

“Some animal lovers, myself included, hate to see any animal die,” Mr. Sander said, but he said he believed the vast majority of people living in the village realized hunting was a necessary component to controlling the deer population. If it weren’t, more people than the 18 to 20 who did so would have turned out when the village held a forum on the matter last year, he said.

Be Sociable, Share!

This post was written by:

- who has written 3102 posts on The Sag Harbor Express.

Contact the author

8 Responses to “North Haven Village to Bring in Sharpshooters for Deer Cull”

  1. Vinny Pandolfo says:

    So having the federal government come in and charge the town to cull the deer herd is accceptabk e? Why not save the money and interview hunters via an application process. Waivers of liability could be drawn up. No baiting. No night hunting. No shotguns either. Just bow and arrow and where applicable tree stands. All at absolutely No cost to any one but the hunters.

    Has any one ever asked why it took over ten years for anything to be done. In regards to the deer overpopulation? Why is it that the USA and there group of “Wildlife management” officers are so eager to push this cull through?

    There is and will always be better alternatives. Dont allow yourselves to be goaded into a costly and ultimately wasteful plan.

  2. Bob says:

    Bowhunters are will to take deer right now at no cost to taxpayers

  3. Arnold Timer says:

    White Buffalo Inc. is 501 a (c)(3) nonprofit wildlife management and research organization. They have nothing to do with the Federal Government.

    The cause of our problem is HUMAN overpopulation not DEER overpopulation. If you are a resident of North Haven, or any eastern LI town for that matter, YOU have usurped the deer’s habitat. People who are vehemently against a deer cull could voluntarily return their properties to their natural state thus providing sufficient habitat for the present deer population. Obviously that won’t happen, so logically some of the deer must go.

    North Haven resident’s properties are damaged by deer and their health/lives are endangered by tick borne diseases and traffic accidents caused by deer. The poor, scrawny, hungry deer who can’t find enough food in their very limited habitat, suffer as well.

    We have a bow hunting season and that has proved inadequate for controlling the population. I believe it is more ethical to kill some of the deer quickly and humanely so that the remaining deer are not starving, as likely to be injured or killed by automobiles, and will be healthier overall. Will I be sad if the doe and her yearlings who frequent my yard are killed? Yes. But I am sad everytime I see them searching in vain for food, and trying to find a way to get to the foliage in my neighbors fenced in properties.

    I hope the town follows through quickly with their plan which will benefit all of the beings who live here.

  4. Jeff says:

    My guess is that it would be easy to raise $5k/four-poster. Dozens of residents of N Haven spend $20+k just for their landscaping, as well as several $k per year on upkeep, even if they aren’t interested in Lyme or dangerous driving.

  5. Arnold Timer says:


    I’ll bet you’re correct about the four-posters but that does not address the unsustainable number of deer on North Haven. We should should do both…

  6. Gordon says:

    Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is valuable and all. However think about
    if you added some great visuals or video clips to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and clips, this site could certainly be one of the
    greatest in its field. Terrific blog!

  7. Meghan says:

    This piece of writing will assist the internet visitors
    for creating new blog or even a weblog from start to end.

Leave a Reply

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off-topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Terms of Service

Follow The Express…

Pictures of the Week - See all photos