Categorized | Page 1

Tags : , , ,

Seeking Immigration Answers

Posted on 05 February 2009

By Marianna Levine

It was clear from the start that several audience members at a panel discussion last Thursday on immigration were not immigrants themselves. They were there as concerned residents who came with their own opinions on immigration they hoped to be able to air during the discussion. However, the event’s organizers, Organizacion Latino Americana’s (OLA), as well as the discussion’s moderator, Joachim Mendez created some ground rules he introduced with a joke to dispel the already apparent tensions, “If you have something you want to say we’ll have a beer later. If you have a question then raise your hand.” He stressed this was an informational meeting and not a debate.

Still the first person to speak was an woman from Southampton who expressed fear that people who were born and raised on Long Island were being treated like outsiders rather than insiders.

“We are American citizens, and we’ve welcomed an international community here for over 45 years. Can we be included in this dialogue please?” To which Mendez responded, “(the welcoming has occurred for) more like a couple hundred years. And we shouldn’t get into this now. I will not allow it. If you don’t have a question we’ll move on.”

From then on there were a plethora of questions from both local business owners as well as immigrants asked in both Spanish and English, and always translated for all to understand. Most questions concerned small business owners and the need for work visas and driver’s licenses for their workers, the actual naturalization process, and most urgently what was occurring with immigration reform in Washington D.C.

The panel, held at the Bridgehampton National Bank meeting room in Bridgehampton, included immigration attorneys Millicent Clarke and Allen Kaye (of the American Immigration Lawyers Association), as well as the Executive Director of the Long Island Immigration Alliance Luis Velenzuela, and Congressman Tim Bishop.

The immigration lawyers fielded the questions regarding the immigration process, often cautioning audience members to be wary of so-called lawyers who promise to put aside tax money for the future for undocumented workers or who make any easy promises about the naturalization process. Both Clarke and Kaye suggested waiting for immigration reform prior to starting any paperwork.

Kaye explained that there are basically only three ways to get a Green Card in the United States. You can either get one through an employer, or by marrying or being related to a citizen, or you can have resided here illegally for over ten years and take your chances before a judge in court. He then explained that trying to get a Green Card properly as an undocumented person almost always means, “You’re asking to be deported.”

Congressman Tim Bishop arrived soon after this discussion began, and addressed questions on comprehensive immigration reform. An audience member asked in frustration, “What is wrong with getting in line and waiting?” To which Congressman Bishop replied, “The fundamental problem is that the current system is a broken system that simply doesn’t work. I think we can all agree that it isn’t working. This discussion is a symptom of the fact that the system is broken. We don’t have a visa system that works. We have people who stand in line for 5 to 20 years and nothing happens.” He also added that, “No solutions can come from the vantage point of anger. I believe we should make a good faith effort to put our differences aside and try to bring people together.”

Bishop explained the new comprehensive immigration reform would come about in four parts in something referred to as the “Strive Act.” First the U.S. government would need to intensify border protection, and crack down on employers who hire undocumented workers. Thereafter the government would construct a visa program that actually worked and reflected the needs of our country and business owners. Bishop explained this would include a simplified agricultural work visa. He then noted that the fourth aspect of this plan is the most controversial, since it would create a path to legalization for those who are currently in the U.S. without proper documentation.

“Undocumented workers would be given a work visa as long as they have a clean record for about 11 or 12 years,” said Bishop. “They would have to pay a fine and back taxes on the money they earned off the books. They would have to learn English and civics and maintain a clean record for that period. After that they would be granted permanent residency.”

Asked when immigration reform would be passed, Bishop answered, “I believe it will be considered sometime in June or September. President Obama has made it very clear he supports comprehensive immigration reform.” He also said that he guessed the bill had a better than 50/50 chance of passing this year.

 

 

 

Be Sociable, Share!

This post was written by:

- who has written 3067 posts on The Sag Harbor Express.


Contact the author

One Response to “Seeking Immigration Answers”

  1. Nina says:

    Guest Commentary: Foreign business owners need a path to citizenship too
    By NINA MOLD, Naples
    January 23, 2009

    As the economy plummets and unemployment figures soar, the United States needs entrepreneurs more than ever before. It’s a fact that almost half the American work force is employed by small business owners, and a lesser known fact that a large proportion of those small business owners are foreign nationals. The irony is that regardless of time spent in the United States, success of the business or number of people employed, those foreign nationals (E2 investors) have no path to permanent residence.

    Due to the failure of consecutive administrations to address this enigma, would-be investors are now turning to Australia, Canada and other countries where their contributions to the economy are recognized, appreciated and rewarded.

    At my small enterprise in Naples, I employ five full-time and four part-time U.S. citizens. I can offer them decent pay, good working conditions and my appreciation for their skills and loyalty. What I cannot offer them is the thing they need most in the current economic climate — job security.

    Each time I have to leave the country to renew my visa, it’s very stressful for all of us. Should my renewal be denied for any reason, my family and I will lose everything we have, and my employees will join the ranks of the unemployed.

    This scenario is played out every day across America, as the thousands of E2 investors, their families and their employees walk a tightrope of uncertainty. If these investors had a path to permanent residence, there’s little doubt they would invest further and create more jobs.

    Some investors come here and find the lifestyle is not for them. Others discover they were not cut out to run a business. But the vast majority of us, who jumped through all the hoops to come here legally, have worked hard to succeed and feel we have earned our chance at the American dream.

    To their shame, U.S. Sens. Bill Nelson and Mel Martinez, U.S. Reps. Connie Mack IV and Mario Diaz-Balart, as well as Gov. Charlie Crist and a myriad of other Florida politicians who claim to be interested in reform and have been approached for help, have declined.

    The fact that Florida is the destination of choice for large numbers of E2 investors is, seemingly, of little interest to them, even though so many of their constituents are directly affected.

    Only U.S. Rep. Adam Putnam, R-Lakeland, has shown any willingness to support our cause, and our appreciation of that support knows no bounds.

    As a new administration takes the helm and attempts to steer the country into calmer waters, I hope the opportunity to pursue citizenship is offered, not just to those who entered illegally, but also to those who abided by the laws of the land and paid dearly for the right to be here.

    You can add your support by signing the online petition at E2Reform.org.

    Thank you.


Leave a Reply

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off-topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Terms of Service