Thiele Supports Millionaire Tax

Posted on 23 November 2011

In a press release issued last week, New York State Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele, Jr. said that he supports the extension of the “so-called” Millionaire Tax, one of the most hotly debated issues in the 2012 state budget discussion.

The proposal would extend for another year the existing tax rate on those earning more than a $1,000,000 a year at 8.97 percent. The rate on millionaires would be reduced to 6.85 percent on December 31, if no action is taken in Albany.

The surcharge generates upwards of $4 billion a year.

“Proponents state that the additional funding is necessary to maintain state spending and programs,” said Thiele. “Opponents say the additional tax will injure the states economic recovery. In 2009, I voted against this tax surcharge because the surcharge was imposed not on millionaires but those with incomes of $250,000 or more, and the revenue was used to fuel one of the biggest spending increases in New York State history. We could ill-afford such a tax and spending policy in the middle of a recession.”

Thiele said that under Governor Andrew Cuomo, the state has begun to address its fiscal woes, and has eliminated a $10 billion budget deficit with no new taxes or borrowing. Medicaid costs were also reined in, said Thiele, and the state adopted a two-percent real property tax levy cap.

That being said, Thiele noted that if the “millionaire tax” rate is reduced to 6.85-percent, those residents making over $1 million a year will be paying the same tax rate as a family of four making $40,000.

“Although I represent the Hamptons, not one millionaire has contacted me to complain about the 8.97 percent rate or has said they are leaving the state,” said Thiele. “At the same time, my office continues to be inundated by middle class residents who are being overwhelmed by real property taxes. Many have left the state. The two percent property tax cap was a good first step, but only a first step. New Yorkers need property tax reduction, not just a cap.”

This is exactly why Thiele has sponsored a new bill extending the 8.97-percent property tax rate on millionaires. It would also create a real property tax “circuit breaker,” said Thiele, for middle class homeowners earning $250,000 or less.

The legislation would cap property taxes based upon a percentage of income reflecting the ability to pay. Excess property taxes would be refunded through an income tax credit. This would reduce property tax payments by the middle class by $2.3 billion dollars. The remaining revenue would be placed in a separate account for state aid to education, further reducing school taxes and maintaining education quality.

“It is fair and equitable and is the path to real economic recovery for Long Island and all of New York,” said Thiele.

Be Sociable, Share!

This post was written by:

- who has written 3102 posts on The Sag Harbor Express.

Contact the author

3 Responses to “Thiele Supports Millionaire Tax”

  1. Raising taxes means taking more blood out of our already anemic economy. Also, anyone who thinks raising income taxes, millionaire’s or otherwise, will somehow magically reduce property taxes is simply being tricked. Your local school district – 70% of your property tax bill – doesn’t care what NYS income tax rates may be. Mr. Thiele’s rationale is silly, which probably means he’s trying hard to please the Democrats who give him a spot on their ticket.

  2. Jan Hanna says:

    “If you make over a million dollars, you’ll be paying the same tax rate as a family of four making $40,000? ” Hahaha. So what??? Isn’t that actually fair and equitable?? Come on, Mr. Thiele…. A little pandering, perhaps? ;-) When you buy a car, do you pay more because you make more money than I do??? Let’s just give millionaires even more incentive to leave this, soon-to-be third-world state so the rest of us can just fill in the tax deficit by ourselves. Oh goodie.

Leave a Reply

Comments are the sole responsibility of the person posting them. You agree not to post comments that are off-topic, defamatory, obscene, abusive, threatening or an invasion of privacy. Violators may be banned. Terms of Service

Follow The Express…

Pictures of the Week - See all photos