Tag Archive | "east hampton airport"

Quiet Skies Coalition Continues Call for Noise Study

Tags: , , , , ,

By Kathryn G. Menu

While air traffic may have quieted somewhat now that the off season is here, at last Thursday’s East Hampton Town Board meeting, Quiet Skies Coalition chairwoman Kathy Cunningham renewed a call to ensure any study of the effectiveness of a seasonal air traffic control tower at East Hampton Airport also looks at the impact — or lack thereof — the tower has had on noise pollution.

East Hampton Town Councilwoman Theresa Quigley agreed, and said she had spent the last week trying to obtain information to ensure that does in fact happen.

On Thursday, November 15, Cunningham raised the issue in front of the East Hampton Town Board, noting the board was considering a resolution asking the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for approval to have a seasonal air traffic control tower at the airport for the 2013 season and thereafter.

For the first time, this past summer, the East Hampton Town Airport had a seasonal air traffic control tower in place, but according to airport liaison, Councilman Dominick Stanzione, needed approval to move forward with the tower next season.

The board would approve that resolution.

However, Cunningham implored the board to ensure a noise abatement program would in fact be studied and implemented by the town.

“There is absolutely no reason there cannot be an airport noise component to this tower,” she said.

Stanzione said the firm Harris, Miller, Miller & Hanson (HMMH) was commissioned to give the board a first draft of protocols on how to study noise some time in the next week. If the town does choose to pursue restrictions at the airport, whether it be curfews or limiting aircraft, taking this route through a FAA part-161 study would give the town the best results to wage such a battle.

Quigley said she had thought it was happening earlier and was confused as to why HMMH was not asked to perform this work sooner but was only commissioned in September despite her believing some forward momentum should have begun in early August.

“Something happened between August 2 and the end of September and that something was nothing,” she said. “I don’t know why. But what they are doing is they are waiting from the data from the control tower people who are supposed to give it to DY [Consultants],” said Quigley referring to the town’s engineers.

Cunningham said she was raising the issue because people were wondering what, if anything, was happening in this arena.

Quigley said a meeting was convened at the airport to discuss noise, on October 26 that she was unaware of. Regardless, Quigley said the documentation she has seen showed a number of questions related to Cunningham’s concerns that would be explored in the study.

Airport Protests Continue in East Hampton

Tags: , , , , ,

Following a September 24 meeting of the multi-town helicopter noise committee, where representatives from the East End towns along with members of the Quiet Skies Coalition and the Federal Aviation Administration met to discuss airport noise and flight paths into the East Hampton Airport, this week a series of protests are planned. Next week, Southampton Town Supervisor Anna Throne-Holst will speak to one of the most affected communities — Noyac — about air traffic noise. That talk will take place at a meeting of the Noyac Civic Council on Tuesday, October 9 at the Bridgehampton Community Center at 7:30 p.m.

In an email sent to its followers, the Quiet Skies Coalition — a not-for-profit made up of East Hampton and Southampton residents — announced two new demonstrations at the East Hampton Airport, located on Daniels Hole Road.

Quiet Skies Coalition chairwoman Kathy Cunningham urged those affected by air traffic to converge for a peaceful demonstration this Wednesday, October 3 and Thursday, October 4 from 4:30 to 6 p.m.

The coalition has also planned a march on East Hampton Village on Saturday, October 6 from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. starting at the small park in front of the Ralph Lauren RRL store. The march will follow village sidewalks south along Main Street, looping around John Pappas Café and along the Reutershan lot and back to the park.

Photography by Michael Heller

Throne-Holst & Scalera Face “Hostile” Residents Fed Up With Airport Noise

Tags: , , , , , ,

By Amy Patton

In a room packed with Noyac residents at the Bridgehampton Community Center Tuesday night, the mood at the Noyac Civic Council’s (NCC) monthly meeting was decidedly hostile. Citizens bombarded Southampton Town Supervisor Anna Throne-Holst and Councilwoman Christine Scalera with queries regarding official actions they hope will be taken to control airport noise in the area.

The source of the aggravation is air traffic — particularly low-flying helicopters —using East Hampton Airport on a flight path that takes them over Jessup’s Neck on their way to and from Long Island Sound. It’s been a continual annoyance, many residents say, since early summer and an unacceptable burden of noise pollution from the sky.

“It’s certainly more than we’ve had in previous years,” noted Randy Ackerman, who said that the disturbances from aircraft seemed to accelerate over the summer months.

Ackerman, a member of the Noyac Civic Council who has lived on Tredwell Lane with her husband, Gary, for 10 years, added that her street receives a hefty bulk of the daily air traffic burden.

“When they fly over, the windows vibrate and our dog jumps up,” said Ackerman. “We were out in the garden over the past weekend and we could barely hear our conversation.”

Ackerman said that she and her fellow civic council members hope to work on “sharing the burden” of air traffic with residents of East Hampton through a “south shore route” flight path.

“It’s a safety issue as well,” chimed in Elena Loreto, president of the NCC. “With the amount of air traffic traveling over the Noyac area alone, there have been several near-misses of helicopters in the air.”

East Hampton’s airport, she said, “was built originally to serve local recreational pilots. It wasn’t designed to take on this heavy burden of commercial traffic that is impacting local neighborhoods this way.”

Supervisor Throne-Holst spent much of the evening trying to soothe the concerns of the residents, who have had ongoing complaints about aircraft noise. She added that Southampton Town is working on solutions based on the deluge of reports that have been received in the past 10 months from homeowners.

To that end, she added that a meeting will take place Monday, September 17, at Southampton Town Hall to address noise concerns “and find solutions.“ In addition to Throne-Holst and Scalera, East Hampton Town Supervisor Bill Wilkinson, representatives from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the airport management team of East Hampton and representatives from the pilot’s association will be in attendance at that meeting which, she said, is not open to the public.

Another hot-button issue raised at Tuesday’s NCC meeting was the town’s proposed “traffic-calming” plan which has been designed to slow vehicles on Noyac Road in front of two of the halmet’s commercially-zoned properties — Cromer’s Market and the Whalebone General Store.

A raised median separating the commercial lot from the roadway and complete re-construction of Noyac Road (including the addition of a center island) has been proposed by Southampton Town Highway Superintendent Alex Gregor. The plan comes with a reported price tag of $480,000 and it drew vocal ire from a majority of attendees at Tuesday’s meeting.

Most of those who spoke railed against the proposal and agreed that “small steps” are needed instead to slow down traffic in the area. These include devices such as rumble strips, pedestrian crosswalks where drivers are mandated by state law to stop, and even, as a partial solution for traffic calming, blinking yellow “slow” or red traffic lights.

Tom Gustin, who shares a home with his wife in the Pine Neck section of Noyac near Cromer’s and the Whalebone, said traffic and quality of life in that area would be negatively affected by the plan.

“We don’t want it,” he said, to the applause of others in attendance.

Towns Talk Airport Noise as Protests Continue

Tags: , , , ,

On Monday evening, Julia Friedman decided to have a dinner party at her home in the Rolling Hills Estates area of Noyac. She invited a handful of friends over, but Friedman’s spaghetti with clam sauce would not be the only aspect of the evening that would awe her guests.Between 5:30 and 7:30 p.m., Friedman and her guests counted over 20 helicopters and jets flying near her home, drowning out the dinner conversation that had naturally turned to the increase in air traffic the Friedman family and others in Noyac say they have experienced this summer season.

“I don’t mind having some of the noise but should we have to deal with almost all of it,” asked an exasperated Friedman on Tuesday morning. “It was just one after the other and then another and then another.”

On Tuesday, September 4, the East Hampton Town Board discussed this perceived inequality many residents of Southampton have been railing about for most of the summer — since it was announced a Jessup’s Neck route was the sole helicopter route being suggested for those flying into East Hampton Airport from Long Island Sound.

On Tuesday, East Hampton Town Supervisor Bill Wilkinson said he understood this concern and had informed Southampton Town it was by no means the intention of his town board to place the burden of airport noise solely on the shoulders of Southampton residents.

Supervisor Wilkinson mentioned a September 10 meeting, during which it has been proposed that town supervisors and board members from both East Hampton and Southampton would meet with Federal Aviation Association (FAA) representatives, airport managers, New York State Assemblyman Fred W. Thiele, Jr. and Congressman Tim Bishop, among others, to talk about ensuring airport noise is fairly dispersed and not targeted around one community.

According to a representative with Southampton Town Supervisor Anna Throne-Holst’s office, that September 10 meeting has been cancelled but will be rescheduled shortly.

However, on Tuesday, airport liaison and East Hampton Town Councilman Dominick Stanzione said the multi-town noise advisory committee, made up of elected officials from the five East End towns, as well as airport managers and FAA officials, would meet soon to discuss the issue.

“We have invited the FAA to come in with some of their mapping people to take a close look at the options with adjustments of tweaks to the power line route being used by helicopter pilots,” said Stanzione.

However, Stanzione said that ultimately, after meeting with FAA officials last week, it was clear that helicopter pilots do have a “high level of flexibility when it comes to traversing the skies, not only here on Long Island but across the United States.” He added that voluntary agreements between pilots and air traffic control professionals on preferential routes are the most viable solution given that flexibility.

Councilman Peter Van Scoyoc said he believed the board should research both the demographics of who is using the airport and also where people are ultimately going, to ensure a fair distribution is, in fact, fair.

“If 60 percent of the helicopter users are ultimately going into Southampton that should play into the discussion about how to make things equitable,” he said.

Agreeing that was a good suggestion, Stanzione added that ultimately aviation needed to be a discussion that revolved around safety first and foremost.

“So what we deal with from a technical and expert level is what is safe,” said Stanzione. “What is fair may not be safe, so we have to be aware of that.”

“I am just really looking for an understanding of who our airport serves,” said Van Scoyoc. “Does it serve residents or people who come from out of town. And I am not just talking about helicopter traffic, I am talking about jets.”

Airport Protest Mounts Amid Anger over Copter Flightpath

Tags: , , , , , ,

By Amanda Wyatt

As hip hop mogul Russell Simmons and other jetsetters drove up to East Hampton airport to catch their Sunday afternoon flights, they couldn’t help but notice nearly three dozen disgruntled East End residents demonstrating outside.

Carrying signs that read “Noyac Fed Up with Noise!” and “Stop the Choppers Now!” the protesters—many of whom hailed from Noyac — gathered at the airport on Sunday, August 19 to rally against the recent increase in noise from helicopters and other aircrafts.

While tensions have been brewing for years, for many Noyac residents it hit a boiling point this July when helicopters were reportedly redirected to take a single, northern flight path over parts of Noyac, Sag Harbor, North Sea and Bridgehampton on their way to and from the airport.

At the protest, Kathy Cunningham, chair of the Quiet Skies Coalition (QSC), asserted that the route change had been “made in a very whimsical way.”

“It took helicopters off the northwest route and sent all of them that approach the airport from the north over Jessup’s Neck,” said Cunningham. “It’s the shortest distance between two points for pilots that are landing here, so it’s considered by them faster and more economical.”

The August 19 protest was not an isolated incident. In a little over a week, a number of other measures have been taken to halt what upset residents call “unbearable” aircraft noise.

Among these efforts is a special forum slated for 7 p.m. this Thursday, August 23 at the Bridgehampton Community Center. The Noyac Civic Council (NCC) has confirmed that CongressmanTim Bishop will be in attendance, and they have invited a number of other politicians and airport officials.

This will be the second emergency meeting held by the NCC in two weeks. On August 15, about 50 people from across the East End squeezed into the Old Noyac Schoolhouse for a special forum.

Architect Barry Holden, one of the leaders of the meeting, has also been circulated a petition. The petition, which is at http://signon.org/sign/helicopter-noise-problem, demands action from the Town of East Hampton and airport managers to ameliorate the problem. As of Tuesday afternoon, there were 269 signatures.

“The airport is in East Hampton, and yet our township is allowing all the noise and all the traffic to come over us,” Holden said. “The last couple of weeks, the traffic has been unbelievable. It has been going both directions. We’ve had helicopters so close you could see the bolts of their undercarriage.”

East Hampton Deputy Supervisor Theresa K. Quigley and Southampton Town Councilwoman Bridget Fleming were present at the emotionally charged forum.

When Quigley spoke, she was received with angry shouting from several audience members. NCC President Elena Loreto kept order with a makeshift gavel, trying to quiet the rowdy crowd.

“On behalf of East Hampton, I apologize for the changes that have happened,” said Quigley. “I am as upset as you are.”

She encouraged residents to call the town’s noise abatement hotline, (631) 537-LOUD. Data collected from the hotline between June and September will be sent to an outside consulting firm, which will analyze the numbers and determine what steps the airport should take in terms of noise reduction, said Quigley.

However, a number of residents lamented that the hotline was often busy, and that it did not accurately reflect the extent of people affected by airport noise. In fact, East Hampton Town Councilman Dominic Stanzione, the airport liaison, told Fleming that the noise complaints were coming from a few houses.

“I know it’s a pain, but I would encourage you to continue to making complaints,” said Fleming, adding: “My view is that [Stanzione] was a little bit dismissive of what that data was showing.”

At the meeting, Noyac resident John Kirrane suggested staging protests at the airport. He, along with QSC’s Patricia Currie and six others gathered at the airport two days later.

During the rally, several protesters expressed concern over what they believed was a near-collision between two helicopters on August 16.

“There was a near-miss between two helicopters 24 hours ago over Jessup’s Neck between two commuter helicopters,” reported Currie.

However, when airport manager James Brundige looked in his tracking system, there was no indication that a near-miss had occurred.

“I could not find any evidence that that had happened,” he said in a separate interview. “From the ground, it could have looked dangerous.”

“People get the wrong impression of what an airport manager does,” added Brundige. “They think I’m a policeman. I don’t control the airspace.”

While Brundige said that he was willing to have his office work with the East Hampton Town Board, he emphasized that he does not “have any authority.”

At each meeting and protest, airport noise was repeatedly raised as an economic issue. Many people were concerned about the real estate value of their houses declining due to noise. Merle Buff, a realtor, reported she had already started losing deals due to the change in the flight path.

“East Hampton takes in revenue, and Southampton’s cleaning up the mess,” Kirrane said.

However, a number of individuals noted that the airport serves an important economic function for the East End, as a whole. According to Michael Norbeck, a Sag Harbor resident and manager of Sound Aircraft Service, there are 75 full time employees at the airport.

“One of the positive points to the airport is that it brings a ton of money into the economy,” pointed out Norbeck.

At Friday’s protest, one man who had just flown in from Manhattan watched the rally as he waited for a car service. The passenger — who asked for anonymity — said that he flies “constantly” and “all over the world.”

“It’s a convenience,” he explained.

To get to East Hampton from Manhattan by plane, he said, it takes a mere 45 minutes.

“And I understand [the protesters’] concerns and I’m sympathetic,” he said. “But frankly, flying is a way of life.”

Looking at the Impact of Airport Noise

Tags: , , , ,

By Amanda Wyatt

To keep the East End peaceful and quiet, you’ve sometimes got to make a little noise.

At least, that’s according to approximately 40 concerned citizens who attended a forum on aircraft noise held by the Village Preservation Society (VPS) of East Hampton on August 9. The group gathered at the Emergency Services Building in East Hampton to hear from a panel of experts, as well as to voice their own concerns about the growing increase in noise generated by air traffic into the East Hampton Airport.

Theresa K. Quigley, Deputy Supervisor of East Hampton, Bob DeLuca, President of the Group for the East End, Dr. Bonnie Schnitta, President of SoundSense, and planning consultant Peter Wolf all served on the panel to address these concerns.

“Our community is a resort community,” said Quigley at the meeting. “People come here for the peace and tranquility, and the airport, we recognize, interferes with that quiet.”

Panel members noted that in recent years, the growth in the local population has triggered an increase in air traffic. This summer, many East End residents — including those in Sag Harbor, Noyac and North Haven — have been particularly vexed by noise from aircrafts.

Panel members also mentioned that 80 percent of flights come in and out of the airport between Friday at 2 p.m. and Sunday at 9 p.m. — exactly when residents and vacationers alike want to relax.

With the exception of a few aircrafts, like emergency airlifts to hospitals, Wolf said, “these planes do not perform any economic function that’s valuable to the town, and they have no real enduring social quality to them.”

Wolf claimed “under one-percent of our community has any use for the airplanes.”

“This is a nuisance, and it should be regulated as a nuisance,” he added.

Wolf suggested a number of tactics for reducing the noise, including reserving airspace, charging higher fees and taking other legal measures to cut back on air traffic.

Dr. Schnitta, whose company specializes in acoustic engineering and design, spoke about the effects of noise on human health. She was particularly concerned about how intermittent noise at night could cause disturbances in sleep.

“Indeed, if it is disturbing to sleep at nighttime, it will cause health problems,” Schnitta said in a separate interview. “We have to protect people when they sleep at night.”

Even if people do not notice noise at night, explained Schnitta, noise can still reduce the quality of sleep, leading to fatigue and poor concentration over time. What’s more, poor sleep is associated with a host of medical woes, including cardiac and intestinal problems.

Although DeLuca, an environmental expert, did not speak about the environmental aspects of noise at the forum, he did mention in an interview that noise can sometimes be disturbing to wildlife. Furthermore, he said that many toxins that come from planes contribute to the quality of air here, which is reportedly somewhat poor to begin with.

“Ongoing management of airports is always a risk with respect to jet fuel, aviation gas and lubricants,” he noted.

At the forum, DeLuca discussed his experience in forming the Community Advisory Board at Francis S. Gabreski Airport in Westhampton.

“There might be a road home here which starts with organizing a new committee to look at the future of East Hampton Airport, getting the issues on the table and trying to get those issues before the [East Hampton Town] Board in an organized way,” he said.

However, no decision has been made about the possibility of forming such a coalition, or any other measures. As Kathleen Cunningham, the executive director of VPS and a chairperson of the Quiet Skies Coalition, noted, this was a starting place for further discussions about aircraft noise.

“It’s really the first sign of something concrete in years,” Cunningham said.


Another topic addressed at the meeting was the collection of data on airport noise. This month, the East Hampton Town Board approved a resolution from Quigley to retain an outside company to analyze data taken between June and September.

“In order to get the approval to restrict helicopters, we first have to prove to the FAA that there is an issue that needs addressing,” said Quigley in a separate interview.

Because the airport receives funding from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the town is not able to restrict airport traffic on its own. Based on the data, the consulting firm hired by the town will determine what restrictions are justified.

For example, Quigley said that the town has voluntary curfews at night for aircrafts. However, until the data is analyzed, the town does not have the authority to make these curfews mandatory.

Still, Quigley said the town is committed to reducing aircraft noise.

“Absolutely, the town has an obligation to deal with this issue, and figure out how they can lessen the burden and make it better for the citizenry,” she said.

Noise Debate Surrounding Airport Continues; North Haven Village Re-enters Discussion

Tags: , , , , , ,

North Haven resident Bill Brauninger no longer keeps track of the helicopters that fly over his home for now it is the moments of quiet that are exceptions. Air traffic flying to the East Hampton Airport is so prevalent it is virtually constant.

“My patience has run out,” said an exasperated Brauninger at Tuesday night’s North Haven Village Board meeting.

Brauninger is not alone.

While Tuesday night’s meeting was largely centered around a discussion about tick abatement, many residents who crowded North Haven Village Hall joined Quiet Skies Coalition (QSC) members Bob Wolfram and Patricia Currie in a discussion about the noise impact the airport has had on residents in Southampton Town, particularly in North Haven, Noyac and Sag Harbor, portions of which are directly on helicopter flight paths to the airport.

Wolfram, a Sag Harbor resident, said that recently North Haven residents may have been given a break from some of the air traffic traditionally seen over the village. He charged that during a visit to the East Hampton Airport’s air traffic control tower in July – a visit he and Currie were encouraged to make by the town’s newly appointed air traffic control officers – he was told by the controllers that one of the two northern helicopter routes was eliminated by East Hampton Town Councilman Dominick Stanzione.

According to Wolfram and Currie, a Noyac resident, the air traffic controllers said Stanzione told them to stop bringing in helicopters to the airport on a northern route that flies over Northwest Creek in East Hampton, but have all the helicopter traffic take the departing route aiming towards Jessup’s Neck in Noyac. That would direct almost all helicopter traffic over Southampton Town.

Wolfram and Currie said they were also surprised to learn the air traffic controllers were not given radar, but binoculars, to direct traffic in and out of the airport.

During an East Hampton Town Board meeting on Thursday, August 2, Councilman Stanzione denied ordering the Northwest Creek route closed to air traffic, stating while it had changed it was not at his order, but rather a decision made by airport officials.

According to data provided by PlaneNoise, a firm the town has hired to analyze noise complaints made to the town’s noise complaint hotline, 114 distinct households outside of East Hampton Town filed 1,498 complaints about noise from the airport in July. Sag Harbor represented the most complaints with 52 distinct households logging 1,120 complaints with the hotline, according to a report released this week by PlaneNoise.

According to the report, one Sag Harbor resident filed 561 complaints – the most by any one individual. The second highest number of complaints also came from a Sag Harbor resident, who filed 188 complaints in July.

According to PlaneNoise, the top 10 complainants – a majority from Sag Harbor – filed 77-percent of the complaints made to the airport hot line last month.

In East Hampton, 48 distinct homes filed 445 complaints with the noise hotline (537-LOUD). Residents from 33 households filed 353 complaints, with most of the complaints coming from residents who do not live in Wainscott or on the East Hampton side of Sag Harbor, but from other areas within the town.

Unlike in the report detailing complaints outside of East Hampton Town, where 69 percent of the complaints were about helicopters, in East Hampton Town jets earned the highest number of complaints in July.

Last Thursday, Councilwoman Theresa Quigley sponsored two resolutions related to the airport, one specifically authorizing the town to send the PlaneNoise data to an outside consultant to recommend to the town board whether that information would justify the town considering a restriction of any kind on helicopter traffic.

The other resolution addresses airport security, specifically the installation of a perimeter security fence and making access to the airport allowable only through the terminal building.

Both resolutions passed by the Republican majority, with Democrats Peter Van Scoyoc and Sylvia Overby voting against the measures.

During Tuesday night’s North Haven meeting, Currie said she was concerned about the second resolution since it could mean the town will seek more Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) funding than it originally sought for a deer fence late last year. QSC members contend that if the town abstains from taking FAA funding in 2014 it could potentially restrict certain aircraft like helicopters from flying into the airport or at least impose a curfew.

Wolfram said it was also incumbent on residents to use the noise complaint hotline. Otherwise, he said, the data will show only a few members of the community around the airport are really affected by noise.

North Haven trustee Jeff Sander said he “100-percent” supported any efforts made to reduce airport noise and limit expansion of the airport.

“I think this board would be happy to write letters to East Hampton and Southampton towns,” agreed trustee Diane Skilbred.

“This village has expressed concern and dissatisfaction at a public hearing about noise abatement and ingress and egress to the airport a couple of years ago,” said Mayor Laura Nolan. “I would be happy to update that letter to the East Hampton Town Board.”

In other airport related news, the Village Preservation Society of East Hampton will host an informational forum on aircraft noise at the Emergency Services Building on Cedar Street in East Hampton on Thursday, August 9 from 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. discussing the impacts of aircraft noise on human health and other relevant topics.


State Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Airport Master Plan

Tags: , , , , ,

East Hampton Town’s Airport Master Plan has been upheld by the New York State Supreme Court, which dismissed a suit brought by a group of neighbors who alleged the plan did little to address airport noise when it was revised along with the airport layout plan in 2010.
In a press release issued last week by the East Hampton Aviation Association, last Thursday the Wainscott based group praised the court, calling this “a landmark decision.”
According to the Aviation Association, the court’s 11-page decision upholding the master plan and the airport layout plan will allow the town to move forward with the repairs at the airport to upgrade the facility without expansion.
“The Airport Master Plan and Layout Plan are not in full force and effect,” said Tom Twomey, director of the East Hampton Aviation Association and a voluntary member of its legal committee. “It is the law in East Hampton. It provides for the repair of the runway. Now, we urge the town to proceed with the repair of the runway without further delay.”
Runway 4-22 has been in need of repair since 1989. Pilots have long complained that the short runway is critical for small planes to make safe landings.
“We congratulate the town on this final vindication of the town’s 20 year effort to increase safety and reduce noise at the East Hampton Airport,” said Margie Saurenman, the association’s vice president.
The Committee to Stop Airport Expansion along with a handful of residents filed suit over the master plan in November 2010, just two months after the plan was adopted by the town board. The suit contended the town did not study noise comprehensively in its environmental review of the master plan, that it used standards that could not adequately assess noise and failed to take into account the literal thousands of noise complaints logged with the town.
On Tuesday, East Hampton attorney Jeffrey Bragman, who represents the plaintiffs, said the group was assessing its options, but that it was likely an appeal would be filed.
“We remain concerned about the fact that the town deliberately selected a noise standard that when you plug in the numbers shows no noise expect within the boundaries of the airport,” said Bragman. “The town’s own expert has said if you only used that standard it would produce irrational results.”
In other airport news, the East Hampton Aviation Association released another statement showing the results of its poll of town residents on whether or not the current town board should accept funding from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
Critics — particularly members of the Quiet Skies Coalition (QSC) — have argued that if the town board does take more FAA funding it will lose the right to have real control over the airport. In 2014, when some of the FAA grant assurances expire, QSC members have argued the town could impose curfews or limit certain kinds of aircrafts in an effort to reduce noise at the airport that has plagued residents of both East Hampton and Southampton for the last decade.
According to the East Hampton Aviation Association, 300 people were polled by the Potholm Group of Maine in April with 88 percent stating they believed the town should take FAA funding to repair runways and taxiways with 77 percent stating they would like to see the funding used for noise abatement.

Letters to the Editor 7/5/12

Tags: , , ,

Bring Out the Best

Dear Bryan,

We would like to express our gratitude to the generous people of Sag Harbor and neighboring towns. We held a car wash and bake sale at the Sag Harbor Elementary School on June 16th. Our goal was to raise enough money to buy a bench in town in memory of our classmate and friend, Katy Stewart. Due to the kindness of our community we exceeded our goal. Our customers waited patiently in line to get their cars washed and buy baked goods. The class is proud of our accomplishment, and we can’t wait to sit on the bench, watch a pink sunset and think of our friend. We think it is pretty amazing how Katy continues to bring out the best in people!


Hannah Jungck and the Pierson Class of 2016

PS  Katy’s family has set up a fund in Katy’s memory that supports education, childhood bereavement, and pediatric cancer research.  For more information please go to www.katyscourage.org.

Laments CPR Bill’s Non-Passage

Dear Editor

It is difficult to express my disappointment that the Assembly did not pass our CPR in Schools bill (S2491/A3980) to ensure that all students learn CPR before graduating from high school. In August of 2006, my 14-year-old daughter, Leah, went into Sudden Cardiac Arrest while trying out for the volleyball team at Bethpage High School. Thankfully, Leah’s life was saved by her coach. However, to think that her fellow teammates could have saved her life as well after a short CPR lesson is empowering.

I am truly thankful to my representative, Senator Kemp Hannon for sponsoring and helping champion the passage of the CPR in Schools legislation in the Senate. He is well aware how important this bill is to saving lives.

Today, far too many people die suddenly from cardiac arrest. If no CPR is provided or no defibrillation occurs within 3 to 5 minutes of collapse the chance of survival drops significantly. With the passage of this bill, every high school graduate will be prepared to save lives in their own homes and communities. With hands-only CPR, it is now even easier to teach this lifesaving skill. In less than the time it takes to watch a 30 minute TV episode, we can give students the skills they need to help save a life.

Please think of Leah this August 31st who will be celebrating her “6th re-birthday” as a college senior at Fordham University. Encourage your state representatives to pass this bill in the next session.

Claudia Olverd


July Fourth

Dear Editor,

July Fourth is the day we set forth to declare our independence. We were young and free, a brand new country which had no equal. We had Uncle Sam. He was our man. He swore he would never let us down.

We were full of life and vigor, until someone pulled the trigger. We joined the fight. We thought we were right to fight with all our might till Johnnie came marching home. They shot him and gassed him. They thought they’d outlast him, but Johnnie kept marching on.

He marched through the fields and climbed the highest mountains.

He marched till he could stand it no more. And so the war ends, he’s lost all his friends.

But Johnnie comes marching home.

Richard Sawyer

Sag Harbor

Folly at the Airport

To the Editor:

Residents in the airport noise affected community who believed airport management and Town Board rhetoric that the seasonal control tower would proactively address noise abatement protocols must abandon that hope.

At the information session held by the air traffic controllers, Councilman Stanzione, Jim Brundige and EH Aviation Association leadership this past Saturday to familiarize pilots with required tower protocols, it was clearly and unequivocally stated that the control tower would not address noise issues. All the bluster about how the control tower would mitigate noise at the airport was distinctly and completely put to rest.

Some representatives from the Quiet Skies Coalition went to listen and learn. And we got quite a lesson.  Interestingly, the only noise abatement questions fielded from the audience came from some local pilots genuinely inquiring how the tower procedures would dovetail with noise abatement procedures.  The answer, over and over, was clear – this “is not about noise”.

QSC never had much faith that the control tower would provide measurable noise abatement, but would spread the nuisance to more neighborhoods, rather than reducing noise by limiting flights.  Another theory held that controllers would influence altitudes, another demonstrated noise mitigation tool – the higher the craft, the less noise on the ground. This notion was also dispelled at Saturday’s meeting. The controllers said they will not dictate altitudes.

This meeting clearly demonstrated the disingenuous treatment of the noise affected by the Town Board and most particularly, Councilman Stanzione, whose lip service to the noise affected and many statements declaring the control tower as the best hope, have now been completely refuted.

As a safety improvement, the tower adds value. As a noise abatement tool, it is simply folly.


Kathleen Cunningham

Quiet Skies Coalition

East Hampton

Questioning Tower’s Purpose

Dear Editor

The “Million Dollar Seasonal Control Tower” became operational at East Hampton airport on Friday, June 29th, and noise-weary residents across the East End looked forward to the promised relief from the non-stop aerial barrage over our homes; that never happened. On Saturday, during an information meeting held at EH airport, the audience learned why.

At the beginning of the meeting, EH Councilman Stanzione expounded at length on difficulties he’d encountered in bringing the new control tower to EHA, and called the tower opening an “historic” event; in the annals of environmental misdeeds it will be, as it will bring increasing commuter air traffic and pollution to our area. On Saturday, Councilman Stanzione failed to mention that earlier claims by EH town officials, airport management and aviation proponents — claims that the airport’s control tower would bring about noise abatement — were not part of the agenda for control tower operators. He did clearly state that noise abatement was not a tower controller issue. Minutes later, Charles Carpenter, spokesman for Robinson Aviation, the control tower operators, said the tower’s purpose is solely safety and efficiency, not noise abatement. An FAA representative nodded his assent to Carpenter’s statement and the leadership of the East Hampton Aviation Assoc (EHAA) smirked.

Readers may recall having seen in East Hampton and Southampton media a number of costly newspaper ads paid for by EHAA, prior to last November’s EH Town Board election. Some ads appeared in the form of 10 questions and answers including: YES, a control tower would alleviate neighborhood noise, not only in East Hampton but over a 10-mile wide, half-mile high airspace surrounding the airport. Residents on the twin forks therefore harbored hope that aircraft noise reduction would follow after the installation of the tower. The EHAA ads also contended that rejecting FAA funds would give EH town “local” control over operations at the airport; both statements are misleading, at best, given the official statements made on Saturday about the scope of operations the tower can control.

The official statements made at the airport this past weekend give rise to immediate questions: Was EHAA ignorant of the facts? Were they “re-educated” by their own high-cost advertising; were they merely duped by EH town officials and airport management? Or did they deliberately misinform the public to help re-elect EH town board members known to support aviation interests and vehemently favor increased airport operations?

The disinformation campaign being waged by EH airport expansionists will continue unabated, but it will merely be a matter of time until the many “facts” circulated by them and EH town and airport management will be exposed as disingenuous. This past weekend and the coming weekend’s 4th July celebrations did and will take place under the usual aerial assault that elected officials at local, state and federal levels have been unable or unwilling to prevent. Area residents daily impacted by noise and air pollution from EH airport deserve better representation from elected officials.

Patricia Currie

Sag Harbor

East Hampton Approves Seasonal Control Tower

Tags: , , , , ,


At an East Hampton Town Board meeting last Thursday, April 5 board members unanimously approved a resolution for the construction of a portable control tower for the East Hampton Airport.

The cost of the project, estimated to be about $360,000, would be paid for by the appropriate airport budget account.  In other words, funds generated by the airport, which by law must be used for the airport, according to East Hampton Town Councilman Dominick Stanzione.

The seasonal control tower is a type II action, which means the board didn’t formally have to seek a SEQRA report before approving construction. However, due to the importance of the subject matter, Stanzione requested an environmental review, prepared by the town, which he presented at a work session last week.

He said in an interview this week that he hoped the tower—which would only take about one month to construct—would be up and running by the beginning of the summer season, May 31.

The control tower would be staffed by an air-traffic controller provided by Robinson Aviation out of New Haven, CT, a company which, Stanzione pointed out, is approved by the FAA.

For Stanzione, the control tower is an important step toward decreasing the amount of noise produced by aircraft flying into the East Hampton Airport in Wainscott.

Most of the noise, he said at last week’s work session, “is caused by 10 percent of the users of the airport, who don’t observe our voluntary regulations.”

These regulations include restricting flight times between the hours of 11 p.m. and 7 a.m., as well as making sure all aircraft maintains an altitude of 2,500 feet for as long as possible before touching down in East Hampton.

Stanzione said the control tower would help achieve higher levels of compliance among all aircrafts. With the control tower, he argued, the town would go “from an already outstanding 90 percent compliance—thanks to airport management—to an outstanding 100 percent using the federal regulations of the FAA [Federal Aviation Administration].”

While Quiet Skies Coalition member Kathy Cunningham said she supported the idea of installing a control tower in East Hampton, she’s still on the fence about whether or not the move will successfully limit noise.

“We’ve never been against the control tower in theory,” she said on behalf of the Quiet Skies Coalition at a work session last Tuesday, April 10. “We just don’t know what it will do.”

The Quiet Skies Coalition is a group of concerned residents from across the East End, which formed last summer in opposition to the town accepting money from the FAA.  While the town’s FAA contract will expire in 2014, should it accept more FAA funding before then, that partnership would extend at least into 2020.

The Quiet Skies Coalition feels East Hampton Town would be able to better regulate aircrafts with it’s own rules and regulations, without adhering to what the FAA deems permissible.

Simply put, she continued, “It’s untested. To be fair, you don’t really know what the results [of implementing a seasonal control tower] are going to be,” she added. “After this summer we’ll know.”